I don’t know how many CLR Forum readers are following this story, but it’s a major news item in Russia and has drawn attention in the international human rights community as well. Last February, in a protest against Vladimir Putin, a Russian feminist punk band called “Pussy Riot” (above) stormed the altar at the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow and performed performed a”punk prayer” called “Mother of God, Cast Putin Out.” You can find the video on the internet; it’s pretty juvenile. Authorities arrested three members of the band for the crime of “hooliganism,” which carries a sentence of seven years. They have been in jail since March. A Russian court today extended their pretrial detention for another six months, to January 2013. The imprisonment and prosecution has become a cause célèbre in Russia, pitting the Orthodox Church hierarchy, which resents the cathedral protest as a sacrilege, against liberals, who resent the Orthodox Church’s support for Putin and see the threatened punishment as arbitrary and extreme. Amnesty International has declared the members of Pussy Riot “prisoners of conscience.” Russians themselves are divided about the case. In a recent poll of Muscovites, half said they opposed the prosecution, but 36% approved.
-
Search It!
-
Recent Entries
- The Top Five New Law & Religion Papers on SSRN
- Onnudottir, et al., “Religious Change and Indigenous Peoples: The Making of Religious Identities”
- Guinness, “Religious Freedom and the Making of a World Safe for Diversity”
- Call for Papers: “Cooperating With Evil, Complicity With Sin”
- “A Coat of Many Colors”
- The Look of Depraved Heart Murder: Further Thoughts on the Faith-Healing Case
- Nones Across the Globe
- Around the Web This Week
- D’Antonio, Tuch & Baker, “Religion, Politics, and Polarization”
- Frick & Müller (eds.), “Islam and International Law”
-
Links





Amicus Brief of Constitutional Law Scholars in Stormans v. Salecky
I am happy to have joined an amicus brief together with several other constitutional law professors –but written by Doug Laycock and some excellent lawyers in Austin, Texas — in Stormans v. Salecky, a case currently being litigated in the Western District of Washington and the Ninth Circuit. The case concerns the free exercise rights of several pharmacists at small pharmacies who have religious conscience objections to dispensing Plan B emergency contraception, and who are being compelled to do so by the Washington State Board of Pharmacy’s regulations requiring all pharmacies to dispense certain drugs, without exception. I am particularly keen on the description in the brief of Smith and Lukumi-Babalu as representing a kind of range of general applicability — the idea being that many cases will fall somewhere between those two points. That’s nifty, because one often sees Lukumi instead described as an “exception” to the Smith “rule,” which has different connotations. You can read more about the case in Judge Leighton’s most recent opinion.
→ Leave a comment
Posted in Commentary, Marc O. DeGirolami
Tagged Conscientious Objection, Employment Division v. Smith, Free Exercise Clause, Freedom of Conscience, Recent Cases